Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 000858/2009 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. These two actions were heard together as they are having common issues of law and fact. The main dispute for determination at trial is whether the loan in DCCJ 858 of 2009 (“1 st action”) (“the NPCL Loans”) and the interest payment (“the NPGL Interest”) in DCCJ 859 of 2009 (“2 nd action”) were time-barred. In addition, the Defendant in the 2 nd action contended that it did not owe any interest payment to the Plaintiff.
Cited by 1 case