Wing Hong Construction Ltd v. Tin Wo Engineering Co Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 13/2010 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 3 June 2010 before Hon Saunders J in Chambers.

Construction and arbitration proceeding involving parties WING HONG CONSTRUCTION LIMITED and TIN WO ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED in High Court of Hong Kong SAR, Court of First Instance. Judgment given by Hon Saunders J in Chambers on 3 June 2010 following hearing on 28 May 2010. The decision includes corrigenda relating to corrections in the wording concerning the justification of the application being brought before the court and the requirement for a proper basis when challenging an award. No substantive legal issues, factual background, outcomes or orders are explicitly stated in the available judgment text.

Cited by 6 cases

Case No.HCCT 13/2010
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date03 Jun 2010
JudgeHon Saunders J in Chambers
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 13/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDING

NO. 13 OF 2010

____________

BETWEEN

  WING HONG CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Applicant
    (Respondent in Arbitration)
and
  TIN WO ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED Respondent
    (Claimant in Arbitration)

____________

Before: Hon Saunders J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 28 May 2010

Date of Decision: 3 June 2010

______________

CORRIGENDA

______________

Please note the following corrigenda in the Decision of the above-mentioned case handed down on 3 June 2010:-

Page 5, between line (F) and line (G)
 
“That, he said, the application being brought before the court.” should be substituted by “That, he said, justified the application being brought before the court.”
     
Page 7, line (D)
  “If a challenge is to be made to an award must have a proper basis.” should be substituted by “If a challenge is to be made to an award, it must have a proper basis.”

Dated the 8th day of June 2010.

  (Vicky Wong) (Miss)
  Clerk to The Hon. Saunders J