Read the full judgment text of CACC 001168/1977 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The appellant was convicted of three offences contrary to section 42 (2) (c) (i) of the Immigration Ordinance. The particulars of the offence in each count were, mutatis mutandis, identical and alleged that the appellant had "in his possession a forged false or unlawfully obtained travel document, namely a Hong Kong Certificate of Identity ..... issued in the name of ..... in that an Entry Visa No. ..... purporting to be issued by the Consul for the United States of America was falsely endors