Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000036/1993 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. The appellant was convicted before Mr. Ernest Lim sitting in South Kowloon Magistracy of the offence of possession of goods for sale to which a mark so nearly resembling a trade mark as to be calculated to deceive was falsely applied contrary to section 9(2) of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance, Cap. 362. There was also an alternative charge of possession for sale of goods to which a false trade description was applied contrary to section 7(1)(b) of the same Ordinance. He was conditionally dis