Read the full judgment text of HCA 1456/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 July 2010.
1. By 2 summonses respectively dated 5 May and 23 June 2010, the 1 st Defendant (“D1”) applies to strike out the Plaintiffs’ (“Ps’”) Statement of Claim (“SOC”) and to dismiss their action against D1 pursuant to Order 18 rule 19(a)-(d) and/or Order 34 rule 2(2) of the Rules of the High Court (“RHC”) and for want of prosecution and/or abuse of process under the inherent jurisdiction of the court (“1 st and 2 nd Summonses”). Such summonses came before me on 13 July 2010. It transpires that Ps have
Cited by 7 cases · Cites 3 cases