Read the full judgment text of HCMA 001172/1992 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. This is an appeal against conviction in respect of two charges of possession for sale of goods to which a mark so nearly resembling a trade mark as to be calculated to deceive was falsely applied, contrary to s.9(2) of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance, Ch.362. The evidence at the trial before the magistrate was tendered by agreement under s.65C of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, Cap.221, and no oral testimony was adduced. The magistrate found the appellant guilty of both charges after heari