BabelCite

Woon Lee (HK) Co Ltd v. Holyrood Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 4/2009 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 6 August 2010 before Hon Saunders J.

Construction and arbitration dispute HCCT 4/2009 between WOON LEE (HK) COMPANY LIMITED and HOLYROOD LIMITED before Hon Saunders J in the High Court of the Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance. Judgment delivered on 6 August 2010 with corrigenda issued on 18 August 2010 correcting references concerning the contractor (substituted for the owner) and amending a monetary figure. No explicit legal issues, factual background, or final orders detailed in the corrected judgment extract. The corrigenda address specific textual errors in the original judgment regarding contractual parties and sums referenced.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 4/2009
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date06 Aug 2010
JudgeHon Saunders J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 4/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO. 4 of 2009

____________

BETWEEN

  WOON LEE (HK) COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff
and
  HOLYROOD LIMITED Defendant

____________

Before: Hon Saunders J in Court

Dates of Hearing: 7-11, 14, 18 June 2010

Date of Judgment: 6 August 2010

______________

CORRIGENDA

______________

Please note the following corrigenda in the Judgment of the above-mentioned case handed down on 6 August 2010:-

Page 14, between line (L) and
line (M)		 “the owner had been engaged” should be substituted by “the contractor had been engaged”
Page 17, line (H) “$40,898,240.08” should be substituted by “$14,898,240.08”
Page 28, line (M) “The owner is entitled” should be substituted by “The contractor is entitled”

Dated the 18th day of August 2010.

(Vicky Wong) (Ms.)
Clerk to The Hon. Saunders J

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Woon Lee (HK) Co Ltd v. Holyrood Ltd
HCCT 4/2009
高等法院原訟法庭
Full analysis
06 Aug 2010