Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000277/1993 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. This is an appeal against conviction from a magistrate who found the appellant guilty of two similar offences under s. 9(2)(b) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap. 201 of offering an advantage to PW2, Dicky Chan Tat-lo (“Dicky Chan”), as an inducement to or reward for or otherwise on account of Dicky Chan showing favour to the appellant in relation to Dicky Chan’s principal’s affairs or business. Dicky Chan was an employee of one Recio & Casas Limited, a design consultancy firm retain