Read the full judgment text of CACC 000085/1989 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 1 June 1990.
1. Five defendants appeared for trial, before Hooper J. and a jury, upon an indictment containing four counts. The first and second counts concerned all five and they were, respectively, conspiracy to rob contrary to Common Law and carrying arms and ammunition with criminal intent contrary to s.l8 of the Firearms and Ammunition Ordinance Cap.238 - the intent alleged in the Particulars was to commit an arrestable offence. The third count concerned only CHAN Ho-shan - D5 - and was resisting arrest