Read the full judgment text of DCEC 000797/2009 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
2. I said that the Post-CJR statements were in flagrant breach because (i) each statement comprises of one page document without stating the qualifications and analysis of the psychiatrist as to how he arrived at 50% (later increased to 60%) of loss of earning capacity and 10% impairment of the whole person; (ii) they have not been verified by the statement of truth pursuant to O.41A of the Rules of the District Court (“RDC”); (iii) the said statements do not contain a declaration that the propo
Cites 2 cases