HKSAR v. Fung Siu Hei

Case No.DCCC 201/2010
Court
District Court
Date27 Sep 2010
Judge
Case Document
100%

DCCC201/2010

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO.201 OF 2010

--------------------

  HKSAR  
  v.  
  FUNG Siu-hei  

--------------------

Before:

Deputy District Judge A Yim

Date:

27 September 2010 at 10:27am

Present:

Mr. Keith HOTTEN, Counsel on Fiat, of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Mr. Niehorster James William, instructed by Messrs M.C.A. Lai & Co., assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the defendant

Offence:

(1)Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

-----------------------------------

Reasons for Sentence

-----------------------------------

The defendant was charged with one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug, contrary to section 4(1)(a) and (3) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap.134.

The defendant pleaded guilty and admitted the facts, he is convicted accordingly.

Facts

At around 7;00pm the defendant was found sleeping alone inside the flat in question. In the presence of the defendant, a search was conducted in his bedroom. Inside a wooden drawer underneath his bed the following were found:

  1. 41 transparent re-sealable plastic bags each containing solid cocaine, in total there are 19.09 gm of a solid containing 13.23 gm of cocaine.
  2. 1 electronic scale
  3. 2 stacks of empty transparent re-sealable plastic bags of different sizes

Under caution, the defendant admitted possession of the ‘Coke’ and intended to earn some quick money for he had a substantial amount of outstanding credit card debts.

In December 2009, total retail value of those drugs amounted to approximately HK$15,577.

Mitigation

The defendant aged 23, at time of the offence he was 22, with one conviction record in 2003. The defendant was gainfully employed until September 2009; he committed the offence because of a substantial credit card debt. The family helped him to pay off the debt. After the offence, he was remanded until 25 February this year, thereafter he works as a transportation worker. The defendant came from a decent family and has full family support. The defendant’s father recently diagnosed with nasal cancer in third stage and currently undergoing treatment. The defendant has committed a serious offence; I do not consider the medical condition of the father amount to a mitigating factor.

Cocaine is a hard drug; I refer to the tariff in the case of Lau Tak-ming [1990] 2 HKLR 370; in view of the defendant’s age at time of the offence and his positive changes since he released on bail, I take a lower starting point and consider 5 years is appropriate in his case.

The defendant entitled to 1/3 discount for his plea. I do not consider there to be any further mitigating factor called for further deduction.

Order

The defendant is sentenced to 40 months imprisonment.

  (A. Yim)
  Deputy District Judge