Read the full judgment text of CACC 000184/1973 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The defendant company was the subject of two separate informations, relating to two separate premises, alleging that in each of those premises it had carried on the business of a funeral parlour otherwise than under, and in accordance with, a licence granted by the Urban Council, and contrary to Bye-law 4, sub-s.(1) of the Funeral Parlour Bye-laws made under s.123 of the Public Health and Urban Services Ordinance, Cap. 132. After a hearing, the company was found guilty upon both those informa