Read the full judgment text of CACC 000882/1973 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The appellant was charged with two charges of forgery of a document and with two related charges of uttering the same documents, namely provisional driving licences. The method of forgery was, in each case, to substitute upon the licence the photograph of the legitimate holder of the licence by that of an experienced driver. The uttering consisted of presenting the document to the driving examiner, the experienced driver being at the same time introduced as the pupil of the appellant who was