Limbu Prya v. Hey Yuet Palace Restaurant O/B Kenberg Investments Ltd
Read the full judgment text of DCPI 2273/2008 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 29 October 2010.
1. The defendant’s representative kept on referring to evidence not adduced during the trial, despite being repeatedly told not to do so by this court. The application has no merit. I dismiss the application.
Cited by 5 cases
|
DCPI2273/2008 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 2273 OF 2008 ________________________
Before: H H Judge Chow in Chambers (Open to the public) Date of Hearing: 29 October 2010 Date of Decision: 29 October 2010 ________________________ D E C I S I O N ________________________ 1.The defendant’s representative kept on referring to evidence not adduced during the trial, despite being repeatedly told not to do so by this court. The application has no merit. I dismiss the application. (Submissions on costs) 2.Costs of this application be paid by the defendant company to the plaintiff, to be taxed, if not agreed. The plaintiff’s own costs be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
Mr Millar, of Messrs Littlewoods, for the Plaintiff Ms Chow, Yim-sheung, in person, for the Defendant | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCPI 2273/2008