HKSAR v. Chan Hoi Tat
|
DCCC488/2010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CRIMINAL CASE NO. 488 OF 2010 ----------------------
----------------------
-------------------------- Reasons for Sentence -------------------------- 1.Defendant, you have been convicted after trial of the five offences contained in the indictment, those being: one offence of aiding, abetting, counselling and procuring the making of child pornography, contrary to section 89 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, Cap. 221, and section 3(1) of the Prevention of Child Pornography Ordinance, Cap. 579 - that is Count 1; two offences of criminal intimidation, contrary to section 24(a)(ii) and 27 of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200 - that is Counts 2 and 4; and two offences of indecent assault on another person, contrary to section 122(1) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200, Laws of Hong Kong - those are Counts 3 and 5. 2.The offences took place between 2003 and August 2005, when the age of the victim, Miss X, was between 12 and 14. These are wicked offences indeed. You took advantage of this young girl. You preyed on her naivety by persuading her to take naked photographs of herself by using her webcam on her computer and then sending them to you. You then arranged to meet her, threatening her that if she did not you would publish the photographs in the media and over the Internet, and also send them to her father’s office. 3.On the two occasions when you met her in 2004, when she was 13, and August 2005, when she was 14, you subjected her to humiliating and sordid sexual assaults in order to satisfy your own sexual desire. At the time of the offences you were approximately twice her age. 4.Your counsel is right; this is a spectacular fall from grace as far as you are concerned. You have a hitherto clear record, strong family support, a good and responsible job which you will now inevitably lose, and a young family who looks to you for financial security. However, that being said, I find nothing that has been said on your behalf this morning to mitigate the seriousness of these offences. 5.It is apparent from the background report that you continue to deny these offences despite the most compelling evidence from Miss X, who was forced to testify to these distressing events. You have shown no remorse whatsoever. 6.In sentencing you today, I take all that has been said on your behalf by way of mitigation. 7.On Count 1, you will be sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment; on Count 2, 12 months' imprisonment, which I order to run concurrently with Count 1; on Count 3, 2 years' imprisonment, which is ordered to run consecutively to the sentence on Count 1; on Count 4, 12 months' imprisonment, which is ordered to run concurrently to the sentence on Count 1; and Count 5, 2 years' imprisonment, which is ordered to run consecutive to Counts 1 and 3; arriving at a total sentence of 5 years' imprisonment.
Application against both the convictions and the sentence dismissed. See CACC447/2010 dated 18 October 2011 |