Li Chung v. The Queen
|
CACC000933/1971 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 933 OF 1971 -----------------
----------------- Coram: Leonard J. in Court. Date of Judgment: 17 January 1972 ----------------- JUDGMENT ----------------- 1. This is an appeal against sentence. In the court below the appellant had pleaded guilty to loitering and to a charge of going equipped for stealing. For the first offence he was sentenced to 2 months' imprisonment and for the second to 6 months' imprisonment consecutive. The learned magistrate had made the sentences consecutive because the article with which he was equipped for stealing was a razor blade. Notwithstanding this fact, and that the appellant, appears from his record to be a professional pickpocket both offences having been committed at the same time and place and being essentially the same offence I consider that the sentences should run concurrently I therefore allow this appeal to the extent that the sentences imposed shall run concurrently.
Representation: Appellant in person. E. So, C.C. for respondent. Oral judgment reduced into writing. |