Read the full judgment text of HCA 001439/1969 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 May 1972.
1. In this case there are two separate applications by the Foo Wai Yu (hereinafter referred to as the “applicant”). One is an application by way of summons pursuant to Order 45 Rule 11 for a stay of execution of judgment. The other is an application by motion in Court to set aside a bankruptcy notice pursuant to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Ordinance. Since the parties and the transaction relied on in both applications are the same I direct that both applications be heard in Court so as to a