Read the full judgment text of DCCC 659/2010 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 30 March 2011.
1. The defendants were convicted after trial of charges of conspiracy to defraud committed between May 2005 and February 2008. The first two charges had been preferred jointly against D1 and D2. Charges 3 and 4 had been preferred against defendants D2 and D3. The charges related to 27 transactions which took place during the relevant period. In respect of each transaction the defendants knowingly caused applications for bank loans to be made in respect of bogus purchase orders supported by false