Read the full judgment text of CACC 000097/1982 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The Appellant was indicted with eight others but was named in only two counts (the 8th and the 9th), which alleged respectively conspiracy to deal with dangerous drugs and conspiracy to traffick in dangerous drugs. In reality it was one continuing conspiracy, but it was made the subject of two charges because of an amendment to the law relating to dangerous drugs during the period of the alleged illegal transaction. The Appellant was tried in January 1982 and, having been convicted on both co