Read the full judgment text of CACC 98/2001 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 7 August 2001.
2. The appellant was D1 and CHIU Sau-lan was D2 before Judge Chua in the District Court. They together faced a total of nine charges. Charge 1 was against D1 only, in that she had obtained property by deception, contrary to section 17(1) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210. Charge 2 was also against her for attempting to obtain property by deception. Charge 3 was against both D1 and D2, for using the identity card of LUI King-hung, Jennifer, without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, contrary t
Cited by 1 case