Read the full judgment text of DCCC 335/2011 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 12 May 2011.
1. The Defendant was originally charged with one count of robbery, contrary to section 10 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210. He pleaded not guilty to that charge but guilty to the charge of theft, contrary to section 9 of the Ordinance. The prosecution accepted the Defendant’s plea and the Defendant was accordingly convicted of theft.