Read the full judgment text of CACC 1/2010 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 27 May 2011.
1. The applicant who was the 1 st defendant in the trial below, was convicted after trial by Deputy District Judge M Chow of seven charges. The first charge was using a false instrument contrary to section 73 of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap. 200). The second to seventh charges were identical, namely, procuring the making of an entry in a record of a bank by deception, contrary to section 18D of the Theft Ordinance (Cap. 210). The applicant was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and four mont