Au Sou Lin v. Zielona Transport Ltd
Read the full judgment text of CACV 99/2010 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 30 June 2011.
1. This Court, upon the defendant’s request, had agreed to treat the costs order stated in the judgment of 17 February 2011 to be a provisional costs order and directed that the Court would consider the costs issue upon the Labour Tribunal completing its determination.
Cited by 1 case
|
CACV 99/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 99 OF 2010 (ON APPEAL FROM HCLA 46 OF 2008) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________ Before : Hon Tang VP, Cheung and Yuen JJA in Chambers Date of written submissions : 4 March 2011 Date of Judgment on Costs : 30 June 2011 ________________________ JUDGMENT ON COSTS ________________________ Hon Cheung JA (giving Judgment of the Court) : 1.This Court, upon the defendant’s request, had agreed to treat the costs order stated in the judgment of 17 February 2011 to be a provisional costs order and directed that the Court would consider the costs issue upon the Labour Tribunal completing its determination. 2.The 6th claimant informed the Court on 14 June 2011 that the Labour Tribunal had made its determination. 3.We are of the view that the appropriate order is that each party should bear its own costs of the appeal and below. The 6th claimant’s own costs are to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
Mr. Erik Shum, instructed by Messrs Liu, Chan & Lam, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the 6th Claimant Mr. Maurice J. Chan, instructed by Messrs Fan Wong & Tso, for the Defendant |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 99/2010