HKSAR v. Song Chang Moo
Read the full judgment text of CACC 235/2010 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 4 July 2011.
Cites 1 case
|
CACC 235/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 235 OF 2010 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 1218 OF 2009) __________________ Between
_________________ Before: Hon Hon Yeung JA, Lunn and Saw JJ in Court Date of Hearing: 8 June 2011 Date of Judgment: 4 July 2011 Date of Corrigendum: 12 July 2011 ____________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ____________________ At page 3, line 11 of paragraph 6, there is a closing bracket ”)” after “the charge”. At page 5, line 4 of paragraph 13, “that is” should read “that was”. Also in the same paragraph, line 5, “whhich” should read “which”. At page 6, line 4 of paragraph 14, “was” be deleted. At page 6, line 5 of paragraph 15, “Korea” should read “Korean”. At page 7, paragraph 18, reasons for verdict, paragraph 30, line 3 “that purpose” should read “that the purpose”. Under the same paragraph of reasons for verdict, line 7, “as do” should read “as do I”. At page 11, line 2 of paragraph 29, “was” be deleted. In line 4 of the same paragraph “the sums” should read “the sum”. At page 12, paragraph 30, the quote of paragraph 32, line 6 “the accounts” should read “the account”. Last page, line 2 of paragraph 34, “ appeal against conviction” should read “appeal against conviction the appeal”.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 235/2010