Read the full judgment text of DCEC 699/2010 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 27 June 2011.
1. The applicant applies for leave to adduce further expert evidence from psychiatrists on the applicant’s psychiatric problem developed after the accident. The application is opposed by the respondent. The respondent’s legal representative, Mr Wu, pointed out the applicant’s solicitors first raised the request in their correspondence on 16 March 2011. However, the applicant in his witness statement dated 21 March 2011 failed to make any specific reference other than a one-line reference to his