Ho Ka Yin v. Express Security Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 344/2008 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 July 2011.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCPI 344/2008
Court
High Court CFI
Date21 Jul 2011
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 344/2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 344 OF 2008

____________

BETWEEN

  HO KA YIN Plaintiff

and

  EXPRESS SECURITY LIMITED Defendant
____________

Before : Hon McWalters J in Court

Dates of Hearing : 24 to 26 May 2011 and 15 to 16 June 2011

Date of Judgment : 21 July 2011

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------

The first sentence of paragraph 45 on page 14,

“She subsequently had four sessions with a clinical psychologist which provided her with some assistance by did not get rid of her fears altogether.”

should read

“She subsequently had four sessions with a clinical psychologist which provided her with some assistance but did not get rid of her fears altogether.”

The third sentence of paragraph 50 on page 17,

“She returned to the Duchess of Kent Children’s Hospital where she was again treated with a bilateral hip spica and discharged in March 2007.”

should read

“She returned to the Duchess of Kent Children’s Hospital where she was again treated with a bilateral hip spica and discharged on 27 July 2007.”

The first sentence of paragraph 96 on page 34,

“There is do doubt that the sequelae, together with the uneven pathway, contributed to the plaintiff becoming unstable within the wheelchair, losing her balance and her body moving forward.”

should read

“There is no doubt that the sequelae, together with the uneven pathway, contributed to the plaintiff becoming unstable within the wheelchair, losing her balance and her body moving forward.”

Dated this 15th day of August 2011.

 
   (Danny Tse)
  Clerk to Hon McWalters J