Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1061/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 August 2011 before 張澤祐, 朱芬齡.
This case concerns an application for leave to appeal against a District Court custody order in a matrimonial proceeding – The Petitioner, LH (Mother), and the Respondent, WKH (Father), married in 1998 in Mainland China with a son born in 2000 – The Mother settled in Hong Kong in 2003 and divorce proceedings commenced in 2008 – On 7 February 2011, the District Court made a custody order under the Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance (Cap 192) s.19, granting joint custody to both parents, care and control to the Mother, and reasonable access to the Father – The Mother applied for leave to appeal, refused by the District Court Judge on 24 May 2011 – She then applied to the Court of Appeal of the High Court – The Court of Appeal considered the statutory test for leave to appeal, requiring a reasonable chance of success – The Court examined the Mother's grounds, including allegations of the Father's character, traffic costs, and website publication – The Court held that the District Court Judge exercised discretion based on the ability of parents to agree on major issues for the child, citing PD v. KWW (CACV 188/2009) – The Court found the Mother failed to prove her appeal grounds had a reasonable chance of success – Grounds regarding the Father's character, traffic costs, and website upload were found irrelevant to the issue of parental negotiation ability – The Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal – Under the Rules of the High Court Order 59 rule 2A(8), the Court ordered that the Mother cannot request reconsideration under rule 2A(7) – The judgment emphasizes the welfare of the child and the practical ability of parents to cooperate
Legal issues: Leave to appeal application
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Cites 1 case