Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 5321/2009 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 18 August 2011.
1. The Plaintiff (“ Centaline ”) claims against the Defendant (“ Yip ”) for liquidated damages upon Yip’s default in completing the sale and purchase of a property that he agreed to through Centaline as his estate agent in 2009. Yip resists the claim on the basis that Centaline was in breach of its duties as his estate agent. Yip used to have legal representation up to and including the pre-trial review. He acted in person in the trial.
Cited by 4 cases · Cites 2 cases