Salim Mohammed v. Director of Immigration

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 100/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 25 November 2011.

1. Paragraph 15 of the judgment should read as follows:

Case No.HCAL 100/2011
Court
High Court CFI
Date25 Nov 2011
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL100/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 100 OF 2011

____________

BETWEEN

  SALIM MOHAMMED Applicant
and
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Putative
  Respondent

____________

Before : Hon Au J in Court

Date of Hearing: 25 November 2011

Date of Judgment: 25 November 2011

Date of Reasons for Judgment: 25 November 2011

_______________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_______________________________

1.Paragraph 15 of the judgment should read as follows:

“15. At the same time, the Applicant has been re-detained since 20 May 2011 under s. 32(3)1 32(3A)1of the Ordinance, and is now due to be removed.”

2.A typographical error in paragraph 19 of the judgment as follows:

“19. … As said by Stock J (as he then was) in Fidelis AQhuwaraezeama Ahuwaraezeama Emem v Superintendent of Victoria Prison ...

(C.F. Tam)
Clerk to Hon Au J
High Court
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 100/2011