The Incorporated Owners of Po Hang Building v. Sam Woo Marine Works Ltd

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 1271/2011 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 8 December 2011.

1. Page 10, paragraph 24, at H-I, the sentence “The construction advocated by Ms. Ng actually entails a substantial rewriting of Clause 3(i): “ those unused portion of the total monthly payments payable which have already been paid by an owner to the Manager by the owners.” should be replaced by “The construction advocated by Ms. Ng actually entails a substantial rewriting of Clause 3(i): “If those unused portion of the total monthly payments payable which have already been paid to the Manager b

Cites 1 case

Case No.DCCJ 1271/2011
Court
District Court
Date08 Dec 2011
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 1271/2011

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION No. 1271 OF 2011

____________

BETWEEN

THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF
PO HANG BUILDING
Plaintiff
AND
SAM WOO MARINE WORKS LIMITED Defendant

____________

Before: Deputy District Judge Kent Yee in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 8 December 2011

Date of Judgment: 8 December 2011

Date of Reasons for Judgment: 19 December 2011

Date of this Corrigendum: 30 January 2012

_______________________________________

CORRIGENDUM

_______________________________________

1.Page 10, paragraph 24, at H-I, the sentence “The construction advocated by Ms. Ng actually entails a substantial rewriting of Clause 3(i): “those unused portion of the total monthly payments payable which have already been paid by an ownerto the Manager by the owners.” should be replaced by “The construction advocated by Ms. Ng actually entails a substantial rewriting of Clause 3(i): “If those unused portion of the total monthly payments payable which have already been paid to the Manager by any of the owners…”

(Ms Lanny Cheng )
Clerk to Deputy District Judge Kent Yee