Mkgwh (Aka Mkkwh) v. Rksh
Read the full judgment text of CACV 229/2010 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 12 January 2011.
1. Paragraph 65 should read as “For these reasons, on the basis of the undertakings proffered by the Husband and set out in this judgment (including the undertaking that he would not vote the M Foundation shares at the AGM), we order that the appeal be allowed and the 2 nd Order of 7 October 2010 be set aside. We will make a costs order nisi that the Wife should pay the Husband’s costs of the appeal and half the costs of the application for her success in obtaining the 1 st Order.”
Cites 1 case
|
CACV 229/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 229 OF 2010 (ON APPEAL FROM HCMC NO.9 OF 2010) ---------------------
Before: Hon Cheung and Yuen JJA in Court Date of hearing: 4 January 2011 Date of judgment: 12 January 2011 ----------------------------------- CORRIGENDA ----------------------------------- 1. Paragraph 65 should read as “For these reasons, on the basis of the undertakings proffered by the Husband and set out in this judgment (including the undertaking that he would not vote the M Foundation shares at the AGM), we order that the appeal be allowed and the 2nd Order of 7 October 2010 be set aside. We will make a costs order nisi that the Wife should pay the Husband’s costs of the appeal and half the costs of the application for her success in obtaining the 1st Order.” Dated this 17 January 2011.
| |||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 229/2010