Read the full judgment text of HCMP 107/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 January 2012.
1. The defendant raised two points. The first one is the lack of urgency because the plaintiff has not acted with a sufficient sense of despatch. I do not agree that the plaintiff has delayed the matter to the extent of showing no urgency. I think the plaintiff could have acted faster, but the delay is not a serious one. I would therefore adopt a middle of the road approach. Since the defendant is willing to expedite its affidavit in opposition, I direct that the defendant shall file and serve i
Cites 1 case