Read the full judgment text of HCA 1780/2009 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 February 2012.
1. By my judgment dated 22.11.2010, I ordered that the plaintiff should have costs on both the claim and counterclaim. Since the defendants (collectively referred to as “Madam Tam”) were legally aided, section 16C(1)(b)(ii) of the Legal Aid Ordinance, Cap 91, applied. The Director of Legal Aid (“DLA”) was not liable for the plaintiff’s costs incurred on the claim but only those on defending the counterclaim. The costs position of the non-legally aided plaintiff was thus as if he had lost on t
Cited by 6 cases · Cites 1 case