Read the full judgment text of HCMP 2217/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 February 2012.
1. The papers have been served on the defendant a long time ago. There is no basis for an adjournment for the defendant to file an affidavit in opposition. The defendant's solicitors also cannot indicate what will be said on the affidavit if an adjournment should be granted. The only matter said by the solicitor in opposition is that one Lam Yuk Tong may claim or has claimed some interest in the property. That is no justification for the defendant to register his monetary claim in HCA 984/2011 a