Chow Mee Yee Millie v. Hong Kong Mediation Services Ltd

HCSA 17/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO 17 OF 2011

(On appeal from Small Claims Tribunal Claim No SCTC 55541/2010)

____________

BETWEEN

____________

Before: Hon Au J in Chambers

Dates of Hearing: 25 August 2011 & 22 November 2011

Date of Decision: 16 February 2012

_____________

CORRIGENDUM

_____________

Paragraph 12 of the Decision should read as follows:

“12. On the same date (i.e., 12 August 2010), the claimant and a Mr Leung Cheung of the defendant had a telephone conversation (“the 12 August Conversation”) relating, amongst others, the claimant’s concern that whether she could recover the fees for the time incurred in reading those documents if eventually the mediation did not proceed.  The claimant and the defendant disputed on the content of the 12 August Conversation at the trial before the Adjudicator.”