HKSAR v. Chan Wai Lok
|
DCCC 61/2012 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CRIMINAL CASE NO. 61OF 2012 -----------------------------------
--------------------------------- Reasons for Sentence --------------------------------- Charge and facts 1.The police executed a search warrant on a public housing unit occupied by the defendant and his mother. There were a number of empty resealable plastic bags and an electronic scale on the desk in his bedroom. Under his pillow were 1 small and 3 big bags of drug, 42.94 g in gross weight or 15.36 g in ketamine in total. 2.Under caution, he said he was a delivery worker earning $3,000 a week. He had bought 42 g of drug 4 days ago at $2,400. The empty bags and the scale were for packaging it. He had been on ketamine for a year. He would inhale it once or twice a week. He would have 0.2 – 0.3 g each time but later said that it was 2 g each time. 3.The retail value was estimated to be $4,700. Personal background and mitigation 4.He is 21 years of age, F. 3 education level. He has a clear record. He lives with his parents and a younger sister. His father is a dim sum master whereas his mother is a dim sum worker in the same restaurant. From February to September 2011, he was a dim sum apprentice but could not bear the early and long hours. In October 2011, he delivered stationery on a daily basis, earning $3,000 a week. 5.His counsel informs me that he would take out a bag with 2 g each time for himself and to treat his friends to show face. She accepts, quite properly so in my view, that the bulk of drug would have lasted him 9 months for self-consumption. I am given to understand that he himself had no preconceived idea of the apportionment between trafficking and self-consumption. Sentencing guidelines 6.There are sentencing guidelines for trafficking in ketamine laid down in HKSAR v Hii Siew Cheng [2007] 1 HKLRD 1. For 10 – 50 g of ketamine, the sentence shall be 4 – 6 years. Sentencing this defendant 7.He was found to have “42.94 g” of the mixture powder. His admission was that he had bought “42 g” of it 4 days ago. It means that he had not consumed any of it those 4 days. He has been into ketamine for only 1 year and inhaled it once or twice a week. That speaks for a recreational user, not a dependant. Piecing all these together, the irresistible inference is that a significant majority of the drug was for trafficking. 8.I take 4 years as the starting point. I give one-third discount for his plea of guilty. There are no other mitigating factors. The sentence is 2 years and 8 months.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment