Taibao Investment and Management (Hong Kong) Co Ltd V.Kary Enterprises (Holdings) Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 642/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 16 April 2012.
1. In paragraph 34, the sentence “Since the June Order is an order determining in a summary way the substantive rights of a party to an action, under O 59 r 21 of the RHC” should be deleted and substituted by “Under O 58 r 1 of the RHC”.
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 642/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 642 OF 2011 _____________ BETWEEN
_____________ Before: Deputy High Court Judge Lok in Chambers Date of Hearing: 8 March 2012 Date of Decision: 16 April 2012 __________________ CORRIGENDUM __________________ 1.In paragraph 34, the sentence “Since the June Order is an order determining in a summary way the substantive rights of a party to an action, under O 59 r 21 of the RHC” should be deleted and substituted by “Under O 58 r 1 of the RHC”. Dated the 19th day of April 2012
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 642/2011