Read the full judgment text of HCMA 396/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 16 March 2012.
1. The proceedings against the appellant arose from water seepage in a building in which he owned a flat known as "3A". Water seeped into the kitchen of the flat below his, "2A". It was the prosecution's case that the water emanated from a room, which apparently was usually used by an employee, in his flat which contained a shower, a hand basin and, initially, a toilet bowl: it was referred to at trial as "the servant’s toilet". I shall refer to it as the shower room. The shower room, below whic