Read the full judgment text of HCA 69/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 10 April 2012.
1. The plaintiff sues the defendants in fraud. It is said that goods under a third invoice had been paid for by the plaintiff but were not delivered. Those goods had been ordered by the 1 st defendant’s company called MLL which acted as the plaintiff’s agent in Hong Kong. The 2 nd defendant is the 1 st defendant’s wife and the 3 rd defendant is his mother.
Cites 1 case