Andrew Brine and Another v. Liquor Licensing Board

Case No.HCAL 33/2012
Court
High Court CFI
Date31 May 2012
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCAL 33/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO. 33 OF 2012

______________

 

IN THE MATTER of an application by Andrew Brine (“the 1st Applicant”) and Creative Sun Limited (“the 2nd Applicant”) (collectively “the Applicants”) for Leave to apply for Judicial Review pursuant to Order 53, rule 3 of the Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A)

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER of the continuing decision of the Liquor Licensing Board (“the Respondent”) to fail and/or refuse to issue a liquor licence as ordered by the Municipal Services Appeals Board in Appeal No. 41 of 2011 on 27th February 2012

______________

BETWEEN    
  ANDREW BRINE 1st Applicant
  CREATIVE SUN LIMITED 2nd Applicant
  and  
  LIQUOR LICENSING BOARD Respondent

______________

HCAL 43/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO. 43 OF 2012

______________

BETWEEN    
  LIQUOR LICENSING BOARD Applicant
  and  
  MUNICIPAL SERVICES APPEALS BOARD Respondent
  and  
  ANDREW BRINE Interested Party

______________

(Heard together)

Before: Hon Reyes J in Court
Date of Hearing: 21 May 2012
Date of Judgment: 31 May 2012

__________________

CORRIGENDA

__________________

Kindly note the following corrections in the Judgment of the above cases handed down by the Honourable Mr. Justice Reyes on 31 May, 2012:-

Page 6, paragraph 16, between the lines Q & R, the reference to “Brian and Creative” should read as “Brine and Creative”.

Page 13, heading of C, between the lines K & L, the word “Where” should read as “Whether”.

Dated this 4th day of June, 2012.

  (S.C. Cheung)(Miss) 
  Clerk to Hon Reyes, J