HKSAR v. Peter Raymond Baird

Read the full judgment text of DCCC 242/2011 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 11 May 2012.

1. Defendant, you have been convicted, after trial, of an offence of fraud, contrary to section 16A of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210, Laws of Hong Kong, the particulars of which have been adequately set out in my reasons for verdict.

Case No.DCCC 242/2011
Court
District Court
Date11 May 2012
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCC242/2011

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 242 OF 2011

----------------------

  HKSAR  
  v.  
  Peter Raymond Baird  
----------------------
Before: H H Judge Geiser
Date: 11 May 2012 at 10.56 am
Present: Mr Jones Tsui, SPP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Mr Neil Mitchell, instructed by Messrs Littlewoods, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the Defendant
Offence:  Fraud (欺詐罪)

---------------------

Reasons for Sentence

---------------------

1.Defendant, you have been convicted, after trial, of an offence of fraud, contrary to section 16A of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210, Laws of Hong Kong, the particulars of which have been adequately set out in my reasons for verdict.

2.You dishonestly, and with intent to defraud, took advantage of the arrangements that had been made between yourself and PW1, the victim in this case, and while knowing that no standby letter of credit would ever be forthcoming transferred out of the escrow account slightly over US$600,000 to the obvious detriment of PW1. 

3.As a result of your arrest at the airport in January of 2011, and your subsequent detention, I am told that you had been unable to continue to pay rental on your office premises and, as a result, lost your deposit of some $280,000 or thereabouts.  In my view, you only have yourself to blame for this.  But, in addition, I am urged to consider the fact that you have suffered from stress due to a delay in the resolution of these proceedings.  Through no fault of your own the trial date has been adjourned on two occasions by application of the prosecution.  The trial was originally listed for hearing in August of last year and did not start until some eight months later in April of this year.

4.You are, I am told, 51 years of age, a New Zealander, married with two daughters.  You have a background in insurance and financial management.  Being involved in this sort of business, no doubt you will be aware that commercial fraud is always serious, and in this particular case the amount of funds involved is quite substantial, the equivalent of approximately HK$4½ million.

5.I propose to adopt a starting point of 3½ years’ imprisonment.  I am prepared to discount this by 3 months to take account of the delay that has occurred in these proceedings, which no doubt has caused you to suffer stress, coming to 3 years and 3 months’ imprisonment.   

  H H Judge Geiser
  District Judge
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under DCCC 242/2011