BabelCite

Phoneyork Co Ltd v. Chesson International (Holdings) Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2192/2007 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 June 2012.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 2192/2007
Court
High Court CFI
Date22 Jun 2012
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 2192/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 2192 OF 2007

____________

BETWEEN
  PHONEYORK COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff

and
  CHESSON INTERNATIONAL (HOLDINGS) LIMITED Defendant
 

and

  
  CENTALINE PROPERTY AGENCY LIMITED
(中原地產代理有限公司)		 Third Party
____________
Before: Recorder Yuen, SC in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 18 June 2012
Date of Decision: 22 June 2012
Date of Corrigendum: 3 July 2012

_______________

CORRIGENDUM

_______________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 22 June 2012 :-

Line 4 of Paragraph 16 on page 7:

“Such an argument simply can withstand scrutiny.” should read “Such an argument simply cannot withstand scrutiny.”

Dated this 3rd day of July 2012

  (Arison Bau)
  Clerk to Recorder R.Yuen, S.C 
Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Phoneyork Co Ltd v. Chesson International (Holdings) Ltd and Another
HCA 2192/2007
High Court CFI22 Jun 2012
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2192/2007

Phoneyork Co Ltd v. Chesson International (Holdings) Ltd
High Court CFI21 Aug 2008
Phoneyork Co Ltd v. Chesson International (Holdings) Ltd
High Court CFI28 May 2012
Phoneyork Co Ltd v. Chesson International (Holdings) Ltd
High Court CFI28 May 2012
Phoneyork Co Ltd v. Chesson International (Holdings) Ltd and Another
High Court CFI22 Jun 2012
Phoneyork Co Ltd v. Chesson International (Holdings) Ltd
High Court CFI28 May 2012