Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 3238/2009 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 27 July 2012.
1. The plaintiff commenced this action against the 1 st defendant for the value of the balance of prepaid beauty treatment packages yet to be provided by the time when the 1 st defendant ceased business. Lau joined the 2 nd defendant and held her liable under the Transfer of Business (Protection of Creditors) Ordinance, Cap 49. Default judgment was entered against the 1 st defendant for damages to be assessed. The 2 nd defendant disputed liability.
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case