Read the full judgment text of CACV 130/2011 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 19 September 2012 before Hon Cheung, Lunn and Lam JJA.
Civil Appeal – Leave to appeal to Court of Final Appeal – Maintenance variation – Questions of public importance – Dismissal – The Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal. The first two questions were not argued below. The third and fourth questions did not raise issues of general public importance as maintenance variation is discretionary. Periodic maintenance is not calculated on a reimbursement basis.
Legal issues: Admissibility of unargued questions · Public importance of maintenance variation questions · Calculation of periodic maintenance
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal dismissed.
Cited by 5 cases