Read the full judgment text of CACC 353/2011 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 26 September 2012.
1. The applicant was convicted by Deputy Judge Sham in the District Court on four charges of accepting an advantage, contrary to section 9(1)(a) and 12(1) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap 201 (Charges 1, 4, 5 and 9) and five charges of dealing with property known or believed to represent the proceeds of an indictable offence, contrary to section 25(1) and (3) of the Organised and Serious Crimes Ordinance, Cap 455 (Charges 17 to 21). He was sentenced to 3 years imprisonment. He appeal
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case