Read the full judgment text of CACV 000121/2000 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 23 January 2001 before Rogers VP, Keith JA, Le Pichon JA.
Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance – consent order – variation – lump sum – committal – contempt – attachment of earnings – Edgar v. Edgar – Petitioner in arrears of consent order maintenance and lump sum payments – found in contempt – suspended committal order – Jurisdiction to vary consent order – standard for varying consent order – appropriateness of suspended committal order – Appeal dismissed – order varied to include attachment of earnings order
Legal issues: Jurisdiction to vary consent order · Standard for varying consent order · Appropriateness of suspended committal order · Variation of committal order terms
Outcome: Appeal dismissed; order varied to include attachment of earnings order and specify suspension period.
Cites 1 case