HKSAR v. Akhemetzyanova, Irina

CACC 194/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. CACC 194 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 21 OF 2011)

____________

____________

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------

The paragraph 33 on page 15 Line F,

“There may be more than one basis but, if so, they should he identified.”

should read

“There may be more than one basis but, if so, they should be identified.”

The paragraph 63 on page 24 Line O,

“The sort of evidence relied on by the prosecution in this case has long been accepted as sufficient to found in inference of trafficking.”

should read

“The sort of evidence relied on by the prosecution in this case has long been accepted as sufficient to found an inference of trafficking.”

The paragraph 65 on page 25 Line N,

“…… in dangerous dugs, you will, using your commonsense and sense of realism ……”

should read

“…… in dangerous drugs, you will, using your commonsense and sense of realism ……”

Dated this 23^rd day of November 2012.