Read the full judgment text of CACC 96/2010 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 28 November 2012.
1. In 2002, a Hong Kong listed company represented to its shareholders and to the public that it had acquired an interest in a joint venture with a Mainland company to provide gas facilities to the residents of Chongqing. A document in the form of a joint venture agreement existed but in the criminal proceedings with which this application is concerned, the prosecution case was that it was bogus in the sense that the Hong Kong company had no intention of pursuing the project but had been instru
Cites 2 cases