Read the full judgment text of CACV 34/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 20 December 2012 before Chu JA, Chung J and Poon J.
Civil Appeal – Beddoe application – implied undertaking – confidentiality – Executors – estate administration – costs – Appeal against Beddoe Order and Costs Orders made by Deputy Judge. Executors sought directions to oppose beneficiary's disclosure application regarding documents from ancillary relief proceedings. Court held Executors' right to enforce implied undertaking survives death and passes to Executors. Executors should adopt neutral stance and render assistance to court rather than oppose application. Costs of Beddoe hearing borne by estate. Appeal allowed. Beddoe Order varied. Costs Orders set aside.
Legal issues: Enforcement of implied undertaking after death · Proper stance of Executors in disclosure application · Costs of the Beddoe application hearing
Outcome: Appeal allowed. Beddoe Order varied to require Executors to adopt a neutral stance. Costs Orders set aside.
Cited by 6 cases