Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 7 May 1991.
1. In the appeal, from which leave is now sought to appeal further to Her Majesty in Council, this court declined to accept submissions that the right to give a name of its own choice to a building granted by the developer to a party who then purchased a particular parcel of individual shares in the land on which a building had just been erected was not enforceable by a subsequent owner of that parcel of shares against the subsequent owner of the developer's shares, either by virtue of s. 41 of